"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master." . . . George Washington
Sunday, August 24, 2014
Monday, August 4, 2014
A Problem With the Donkey
A
preacher wanted to raise money for his church and on being told that there was
a fortune in horse racing, decided to purchase a horse and enter it in the
races. However, at the local auction, the going price for horses was so high
that he ended up buying a donkey instead. He figured that since he had it, he
might as well go ahead and enter it in the races. To his surprise, the donkey
came in third!
The next
day the local paper carried this headline: PREACHER’S ASS SHOWS.
The
preacher was so pleased with the donkey that he entered it in the race again,
and this time it won. The paper read: PREACHER’S ASS OUT IN FRONT.
The
Bishop was so upset with this kind of publicity that he ordered the preacher
not to enter the donkey in another race. The paper headline read: BISHOP
SCRATCHES PREACHER’S ASS.
This was
too much for the Bishop, so he ordered the preacher to get rid of the donkey.
The preacher decided to give it to a nun in a nearby convent. The paper
headline the next day read: NUN HAS BEST ASS IN TOWN.
The
Bishop fainted in shock. When he came to he informed the nun that she would
have to get rid of the donkey, so she sold it to a farmer for $10.00.
The next
day the headline read: NUN SELLS ASS FOR $10.00.
This was
too much for the Bishop, so he ordered the nun to buy back the donkey, lead it
to the plains, and let it go.
Next day,
the headline in the paper read: NUN ANNOUNCES HER ASS IS WILD AND FREE.
The Bishop
was buried the next day.
Spot the Differences
President
George W. Bush's speech after the capture of Saddam Hussein:
"The success of yesterday's
mission is a tribute to our men and women now serving in Iraq. The operation
was based on the superb work of intelligence analysts who found the dictator's
footprints in a vast country. The operation was carried out with skill and precision
by a brave fighting force. Our servicemen and women and our coalition allies
have faced many dangers in the hunt for members of the fallen regime, and in
their effort to bring hope and freedom to the Iraqi people. Their work
continues, and so do the risks. Today, on behalf of the nation, I thank the
members of our Armed Forces and I congratulate them!"
Barrack
Hussein Obama's speech after the killing of Osama bin Laden:
"And so shortly after taking
office, I directed Leon
Panetta, the Director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden
the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued our broader
efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network. Then, last
August, I was briefed on a possible
lead to bin Laden. It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this
thread to ground. I met repeatedly
with my national security team
as we developed more information about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a
compound deep inside of Pakistan. And finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to
take action, and I authorized an
operation to get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice. Today, at my direction, the United States launched
a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan."
Friday, August 1, 2014
Cogent Commentary
-->
It’s past time for Republicans to take action against President Obama’s lawlessness.
31 July 2014
Myron Magnet
Constitution Party
Constitution Party
It’s past time for Republicans to take action against President Obama’s lawlessness.
31 July 2014
What’s wrong with Republicans? Here is a
Democratic president who has declared, and demonstrated, that he will not be bound
by the Constitution but will do whatever he can do—both within and beyond his
constitutional powers—to cram his agenda down the nation’s throat. But since
Republicans control one house of Congress, and that one chamber controls the
purse, why is the GOP as paralyzed as a deer in the headlights to arrest such a
power grab? And why has the Speaker of the House made himself so negligible a
figure on the national stage, most recently by addressing the Obama-created
border crisis with an immigration bill as feeble and irrelevant as it is
unpopular, when he and his majority have such power at their command to counter
a president who has passed beyond the bounds the Founders set for the national
executive?
No doubt, the president is impeachable. Of course
he hasn’t committed high crimes, in the sense of beheading citizens after
star-chamber trials—though if it be true that he knew of and approved the IRS’s
mistreatment of conservative nonprofit groups, that would certainly be a high
crime, no less than President Nixon’s Watergate cover-up was such a crime, as
the tapes he lacked the sang-froid to destroy showed. But the Constitution
specifically envisioned impeachment for such unconstitutional misdemeanors as a
president’s not carrying out his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—the
president’s main constitutional duty. So government by edict, like that
exercised by Charles I or Lenin—as when President Obama simply decrees rolling
changes in his half-digested health-care law, or when he opens the border to
“children” in contravention of our immigration laws—is prima facie impeachable
conduct.
But politics, it’s worth emphasizing these days,
is the art of the possible; and impeachment is politically unrealistic. Even if
Republicans win a famous victory in the upcoming senatorial elections, they
will come nowhere near having the two-thirds Senate vote needed to convict. So
impeachment would be mere political theater, which the Democrats seem to think
would greatly help their fundraising and
voter-turnout prospects—it would show “progressivism” under attack, by
extremists and racists, as Attorney General Eric Holder likes to charge with
equal measures of obtuseness and malice. And Democrats are right in this
electoral calculation, because Republicans have no Sam Ervin—no one as eloquent and learned in
the law and in history to make the case, as Democrat Ervin came breathtakingly
close to doing in the Watergate hearings, that the president had crossed the
line into tyranny.
For now, Republicans should use the power of the purse
as effectively as they can, and should try their damnedest to explain why
they’re doing what they’re doing. They have made a good start by cutting the
IRS’s enforcement budget by 25 percent. They should go further: cut the
agency’s total budget by 50 percent, until the IRS produces the evidence
that the House has subpoenaed, and and which the IRS at first claimed had
accidentally been destroyed. Let IRS staff be fired or salaries slashed, until
someone feels the pain enough to admit what happened.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has crammed
through Senate confirmation a Joe McCarthyesque new administrator for the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission? Then defund FERC entirely—and take to the talk shows to
lay out the reasons why shaking down citizens for offenses neither they nor
anyone else knew existed is unacceptable. President Obama has made illegal
appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which renders null and void
all regulations and rulings that the board has made since then? Defund the
NLRB, 100 percent. The president has unilaterally repealed our immigration
laws? Let the House reaffirm them, and pass a resolution censuring the
president for his lawlessness. And let Republican congressmen explain again and
again that the Constitution didn’t create a king, and that the ancestors of
today’s Democrats, with Thomas Jefferson at their head, were vigilant—indeed,
verging on paranoid—in guarding against such a possibility. Nor did the
Constitution give America a queen: so Mrs. Obama’s endless vacations, triumphal
progresses of a lavishness that Marie Antoinette would have envied, should be
condemned as outside the American tradition, even were it not a time when a
whole generation is suffering the economic consequences of the administration’s
no-growth policies.
An opposition party can only do so much when it
controls but one house of Congress, but the Founders’ system of checks and balances
not only licenses but positively enjoins it to do whatever it can to rein in
lawlessness in the other branches. Let the House do its duty, not by rushing to
the Supreme Court as if it were the school principal, but by defunding whatever
unconstitutional measures it can. An important part of that duty is to explain,
with as much wisdom and eloquence as it can muster on every Sunday talk show,
why the Constitution demands such actions—and what kind of republic the
Constitution’s Framers envisioned.
Myron Magnet, City Journal’s editor-at-large and a recipient of the
National Humanities Medal, is the author of The Founders at Home, recently published by
Norton.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)