The Tuesday, March 24, issue of the old Comical contained the following information:
The sentencing report in a 2002 case described the thug who was free on parole when he killed four Oakland police officers last weekend as a "cold hearted individual who does not have any regard for human life" and stated that state prison was the only way "to rein in this man's proclivity for violence."
Now there's a recommendation for parole ! ! ! !
Was that report not available to those who let him out? By whom was the decision to free him made? What was the basis for the decision?
And why are we not getting answers to these questions from the media?
No comments:
Post a Comment