Reality has a way of intruding on even the most global warming proponent such as the Economist, which has had to acknowledge the "mismatch" between increases in purported "greenhouse gases" and the absence of any corresponding rise in global temperatures.
Nonetheless, the Economist struggles to maintain its ideological commitment by suggesting that rising deep open temperatures may be where the predicted but otherwise absent heat increases are going.
However, buried deep in the Economist's attempt to keep the global warming faith despite the "mismatch," is an admission that the evidence suggests something that global warming skeptics have long maintained: Natural variations in the earth’s climate likely play a bigger role than scientific models have said.
A report on the effort by the Economist's effort to deal with the factual quandary can be accessed by clicking here.
No comments:
Post a Comment