"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master." . . . George Washington
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
From a Florida Friend
Three days ago Jesse
Jackson told all African Americans that it is time to boycott the whole state
of Florida. No concerts, conventions or ball games. No vacations in the
sunshine state and no orange juice. Almost instantly the property values in
Florida shot up and vacation spots began to sell out. The crime rate is
expected to fall to record lows.
Monday, July 29, 2013
Obama Administration Portrait
Economic Plan:
Law Enforcement:
Didn't See Nothin',
Didn't Hear Nothin',
Hardly Even There:
And Finally, a V.P. Who Serves As
An All-Purpose Presidential Condom:
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Detroit Could But Will Not Be Rescued
The once great motor city could be brought back from the financial abyss and be resuscitated as a prosperous and thriving metropolis . . . but calculating politicians are not going to let that happen
FIRST, THE RESCUE, which would not necessitate the expenditure of any taxpayer money from the public treasury -- all it would take would be the enactment of legislation to:
1. Irrevocably for a minimum of 20 to 25 years exempt all income, capital gains, and estates in the city and its environs from any federal, state, or local taxes;
2. Cap property taxes in the same area at a level that would produce sufficient revenues to meet the expenses of providing truly essential governmental services and no more;
3. Abolish public employee unions, and substitute right-to work for closed shop provisions in union contracts with private employers;
4. Exempt from sales and use taxes nationwide all goods produced in, or distributed from the Detroit metropolitan area;
5. Abolish all welfare payments in the area; and
6. Issue to parents living together (or single by reason of the death or divorce of a spouse) education vouchers sufficient to fully pay the costs of educating their children at whatever private or public schools they choose.
WHY IT WON'T HAPPEN: The political powers-that-be know the resulting boom would be so spectacular and obvious that it would lead to irresistible demands for enactment of the same beneficial measures permanently nationwide . . . or, in other words, restoration of the free economy that the founders envisioned . . . freeing Americans to develop history's mightiest economic machine until the politicians started tinkering with it in the 20th century.
FIRST, THE RESCUE, which would not necessitate the expenditure of any taxpayer money from the public treasury -- all it would take would be the enactment of legislation to:
1. Irrevocably for a minimum of 20 to 25 years exempt all income, capital gains, and estates in the city and its environs from any federal, state, or local taxes;
2. Cap property taxes in the same area at a level that would produce sufficient revenues to meet the expenses of providing truly essential governmental services and no more;
3. Abolish public employee unions, and substitute right-to work for closed shop provisions in union contracts with private employers;
4. Exempt from sales and use taxes nationwide all goods produced in, or distributed from the Detroit metropolitan area;
5. Abolish all welfare payments in the area; and
6. Issue to parents living together (or single by reason of the death or divorce of a spouse) education vouchers sufficient to fully pay the costs of educating their children at whatever private or public schools they choose.
WHY IT WON'T HAPPEN: The political powers-that-be know the resulting boom would be so spectacular and obvious that it would lead to irresistible demands for enactment of the same beneficial measures permanently nationwide . . . or, in other words, restoration of the free economy that the founders envisioned . . . freeing Americans to develop history's mightiest economic machine until the politicians started tinkering with it in the 20th century.
. . . Suggested by a
very financially
astute friend
Another Incredible Disappearing Obama Campaign Promise
With the Obama administration engaged in prosecuting Bradley Manning and in international bullying to get its hands on Edward Snowden for revealing information about the American government's embarrassingly criminal behavior, it is no wonder that the following Obama campaign pledge has disappeared from the Obama campaign website Change.org:
Protect Whistleblowers: Often the best source of
information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing
government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out.
Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often
save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to
empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in
performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal
workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama
will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing
whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due
process.
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Fall of Once Formidable Movement
Elmer Gantry like faux leaders have squandered the moral authority that just a few decades ago made the civil rights movement a great positive social force in the United States. Instead of undertaking the hard task of dealing with the factors that have created and are perpetuating the nation's black underclass, those currently leading the civil rights establishment foster their followers' grievances and victimization claims. Doing so is easy, cheap, and profitable . . . and keeps them in power over a movement that they have transformed into a shoddy, irrelevant, and disreputable one.
The process and its results is spelled out by the estimable scholar Shelby Steele in this superb essay.
The process and its results is spelled out by the estimable scholar Shelby Steele in this superb essay.
Pathology of the Black Underclass and Its Profiteering Professional Exploiters
Not normally a fan of Bill O'Reilly, but he his the nail squarely in this talking point analysis (which follows the introductory advertisement):
An Emerging and Increasingly Recognizable Picture
Even the financial press is beginning to note the transformation of Officer Friendly to a jack booted thug or, to put it in more polite and politically correct way, the militarization of the nation's law enforcement agencies . . . as well as many other governmental bodies not commonly recognized or thought of as performing any such function.
See this Wall Street Journal article on the Rise of the Warrior Cop.
Wonder how long it will take the nation's journalice to put that observation together with the spying on American citizens by the government's intelligence agencies, the black boxes in our cars, government cameras everywhere monitoring our movements, government monitoring of all our mail and electronic communications. How obvious do the dots have to become to be recognized as an unmistakeable picture of a police state?
See this Wall Street Journal article on the Rise of the Warrior Cop.
Wonder how long it will take the nation's journalice to put that observation together with the spying on American citizens by the government's intelligence agencies, the black boxes in our cars, government cameras everywhere monitoring our movements, government monitoring of all our mail and electronic communications. How obvious do the dots have to become to be recognized as an unmistakeable picture of a police state?
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Another Perspective on How Obama Blew It
Barack Obama, in his recent speech about race, missed a rare opportunity to move America's race relations in a positive direction, as Heather MacDonald points out in this essay.
Ms. MacDonald's piece generally covers the same ground as, and in most respects agrees with the one written and posted by this blogger on the same subject yesterday, but it is far less angry, and much more polite, balanced, and nuanced.
Ms. MacDonald's piece generally covers the same ground as, and in most respects agrees with the one written and posted by this blogger on the same subject yesterday, but it is far less angry, and much more polite, balanced, and nuanced.
The Death of Antonio West
You
won't recognize me. My name was Antonio West and I was the 13-month old
child sitting in a stroller who was shot in the face at point blank range by two black teens who were attempting to rob my mother, who also was shot.
Because
Georgia law does not allow the execution of killers under the age of 18,
neither the one who was 17 (like Trayvon Martin) nor his 15-year-old buddy will face the death penalty . . . too bad.
I was given a death sentence for being innocent and defenseless.
My
family made the mistake of being white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my
murder was not ruled a hate crime. Nobody is looking into whether my civil
rights were violated by my killers. Nor has President Obama taken so much
as a single moment to acknowledge my murder.
I am one
of the youngest murder victims in our nation's history, but the media
doesn't care to cover the story of my demise, President Obama has no children
who could possibly look like me -- so he doesn't care and the media doesn't
care. My story is not interesting enough to bring them ratings so they can sell
commercial time slots.
There is
not a white equivalent of Al Sharpton because if there were he would be
declared racist. So there is no one rushing to Brunswick. Georgia, to
demand justice for me. There is no White Panther party to put a bounty on
the lives of those who murdered me. I have no voice, I have no representation
and, unlike those who shot me in the face while I innocently sat in my
stroller, I no longer have my life.
So while
you are seeking justice for Trayvon, please remember to seek justice for me
too. Tell your friends about me, tell you families, get tee shirts with
my face on them and make the world pay attention, just like you did for
Trayvon.
Thank
you.
For examples of just three of the many other mostly unreported black-on-white atrocities, take a look at this report and/or this one, which is relatively minor, especially as compared to this horrific one.
Monday, July 22, 2013
Judges vs. Juries: Thank God for the Difference . . . and the Nation's Founders for Our Right to It
The judge who presided over the George Zimmerman trial clearly wanted him to be convicted for the death of Trayvon Martin.
Had she been the trier of facts Mr. Zimmerman would be in or on his way to a Florida penitentiary. That also would be the case had she been successful in her inappropriate and probably improper efforts to influence the jury.
Mr. Zimmerman is free because a jury of his fellow citizens found that he had acted as necessary and appropriate to defend himself while under violent attack by Trayvon Martin.
Thus Mr. Zimmerman is the latest in a long string of beneficiaries of the right to be tried by a jury of one's peers when accused by the powers of the state of having committed a crime. That string began in America when a jury in colonial New York rejected the directions of a judge to convict, and instead acquitted, John Peter Zenger of criminal libel charges for having printed criticisms of the royal governor.
Judges as well as many lawyers dislike juries and jury trials. They would have themselves or panels made up of experts like themselves determine the outcome of legal proceedings.
It behooves us to reject their efforts and to remember that the supposedly expert professionals are not impartial. They are part and parcel of the political ruling class. They also want to do away with the popular election of judges to ensure that only members of their class ever sit on their jurisdictions' judicial benches.
Relevant to the foregoing is the answer to the inquiry about the difference between the Supreme Court and the Ku Klux Klan:
Had she been the trier of facts Mr. Zimmerman would be in or on his way to a Florida penitentiary. That also would be the case had she been successful in her inappropriate and probably improper efforts to influence the jury.
Mr. Zimmerman is free because a jury of his fellow citizens found that he had acted as necessary and appropriate to defend himself while under violent attack by Trayvon Martin.
Thus Mr. Zimmerman is the latest in a long string of beneficiaries of the right to be tried by a jury of one's peers when accused by the powers of the state of having committed a crime. That string began in America when a jury in colonial New York rejected the directions of a judge to convict, and instead acquitted, John Peter Zenger of criminal libel charges for having printed criticisms of the royal governor.
Judges as well as many lawyers dislike juries and jury trials. They would have themselves or panels made up of experts like themselves determine the outcome of legal proceedings.
It behooves us to reject their efforts and to remember that the supposedly expert professionals are not impartial. They are part and parcel of the political ruling class. They also want to do away with the popular election of judges to ensure that only members of their class ever sit on their jurisdictions' judicial benches.
Relevant to the foregoing is the answer to the inquiry about the difference between the Supreme Court and the Ku Klux Klan:
In the Supreme they wear black robes
and scare white people
Finally, a Real Presidential Accomplishment
At
long last, after four years of treating speech making as the primary, if not only, duty of
the presidency, Mr. Obama actually has accomplished something.
He has
restored the respectability of racism . . . he has made it socially acceptable
again.
And
that truly is a noteworthy and singular achievement notwithstanding that to
accomplish it he teamed up with the dishonorable Eric Holder, who as his
attorney general heads the Department of Just Us, as well as the scurrilous
racial profiteering reverends -- Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
By
endlessly promoting baseless legal actions against George Zimmerman for having
lawfully defending himself, that racist crew would criminalize any individual
for doing what is necessary and appropriate to defend themselves from any violent attack by any black person or persons.
To
understand that this is so, one need only recall the admonition of the late
liberal Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan that everyone is entitled to
their own opinions but not to their own facts.
And the cold, hard, objective, and largely unreported facts of the
Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case, are set forth in this video.
The
campaign against state stand-your-ground laws is part and parcel of the effort
to protect violent would-be and actual assailants notwithstanding that blacks
under assaults have been the primary beneficiaries of those laws.
The
effort to shield black criminals from any consequences for their behavior began
early in the Obama administration when the Holder Just Us Department dropped
the case that already had been won against members of the New Black Panthers in
Philadelphia. The beneficiaries of that
action went unpunished for having wielded truncheons to threaten and intimidate
white voters at polling places in the city of brotherly love.
Since
then, the effort has been relentless.
Not once in the ensuing four years have Messrs. Obama and Holder and
their minions brought or even investigated a single hate crime case against any
blacks. They talk about an honest and
open dialogue about race but that in fact is the last thing they want. Anyone expressing an opinion contrary to
theirs is immediately branded a racist to shut them up.
In his
recent speech about race, Mr. Obama tried to explain and encourage white
citizens to understand the mindset of the black population. The nation and its black citizens would be
better served were Mr. Obama and his fellow black leaders explain to their
followers that the rest of the country does not understand and never will accept rioting and looting, the burning and destruction of property of
blameless individuals and entities, violent criminal behavior, or a
multi-generation welfare and illegitimate birthrate/single parent culture in which gang memberships substitute for being part of a family.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)